Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829268›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Computational Analyses of Stepped-Lap Composite Repairs on a Full-Scale Wing Model.

Alihan Cambaz, Huseyin Enes Salman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alihan CambazDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye.
Huseyin Enes SalmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Ankara 06560, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7572-9902

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK) 125M209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) components has increased significantly in civilian aviation, necessitating effective maintenance and repair strategies to ensure durability and performance. While prior studies have focused on composite repair methods, such as stepped scarf patch and bolted joint repairs, these were limited to specimen and panel levels without addressing full-scale wing models. This study bridges that gap by evaluating stepped-lap repairs on a full-scale composite wing model under realistic loading conditions and exploring various repair scenarios. To reduce computational cost, two-dimensional shell elements were employed to simulate repairs, with results validated using experimental tensile test data from stepped-lap repaired specimens. Numerical models were developed for single regions and two closely located repair regions. For single-region repairs, adding up to two extra layers enhanced mechanical strength, but three extra layers increased strain, diminishing performance. For two closely located repairs, additional layers improved strength, though less effectively than single-region repairs. Square-shaped repairs exhibited higher strain due to stress concentrations at the corners, while circular repairs showed more uniform stress and strain distribution. These findings emphasize the importance of optimizing repair geometry and layer configurations using numerical simulations to ensure optimal structural performance of CFRP components.

Indexed as

adhesively bonded stepped-lapcomposite repairfinite element modelHashin criterionon-site repair

Identifiers

PMID41829268
PMCPMC12987094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.