ArticlePolymers2026
Bound Rubber as a Transferable Structural Descriptor: Connecting MD-Derived Interfacial Scaling to Continuum Reinforcement Models.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bimodal Interphase Architecture in Filled Elastomers: Molecular Dynamics Evidence and Experimental Signatures.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Filled elastomers often exhibit a low-frequency power-law storage modulus (G-prime), yet quantitative links between molecular interfacial structure and macroscopic reinforcement remain unresolved. This gap is addressed using a hierarchical multiscale framework that integrates coarse-grained molecular dynamics (MD) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). Overall, MD contributes transferable structural descriptors rather than direct macro-rheology prediction. MD simulations yield a bound-layer scaling relation for chain length N=50 in coarse-grained simulations serving as a structural probe. For EPDM master curves, the single-phase fractional Maxwell model is statistically preferred (Delta AICc > 147, n = 56), reflecting limited statistical power; larger datasets (e.g., PC/ABS, n = 952) favor the dual-phase formulation. For cross-scale prediction, an MD-derived effective-volume-fraction baseline (MAPE = 54.1%) provides a structural prior; the regime-partitioned bridge model absorbs relaxation physics not resolved at the MD scale, reducing error to 7.3% (blocked-CV MAPE = 9.5%, with a 2.3% fold-to-fold spread). Linear-viscoelastic constraints improve nonlinear PTT calibration, reducing die-swell error by 87%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.