Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829176›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Deterministic Pilot Risk-Benefit Assessment of Latvian Inland Fish: Safe Weekly Consumption Guidance.

Janis Rusko, Elizabete Murniece, Santa Sibule, Ilva Lazda, Dzintars Zacs, Ruta Medne, Inese Siksna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janis RuskoInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9027-8895
Elizabete MurnieceInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.
Santa SibuleInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.
Ilva LazdaInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.
Dzintars ZacsInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8951-6609
Ruta MedneInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9801-0084
Inese SiksnaInstitute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment "BIOR", Lejupes Street 3, LV-1076 Riga, Latvia.

Funding

Ministry of Agriculture, Latvia VPP-ZM-VRIIILA-2024/1-0002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish consumption provides nutritional benefits but can also contribute to exposures to bioaccumulative contaminants, requiring guidance that integrates both dimensions. We conducted a deterministic pilot risk-benefit assessment of Latvian inland lake fish using pooled samples stratified by lakes and species. Risks were characterized for methylmercury, estimated from total mercury, and for Σ4 PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS) by calculating weekly intakes under three consumption scenarios (150, 300, and 450 g/week) for a 70 kg adult and comparing them to health-based guidance values. Benefits were quantified as weekly contributions of EPA + DHA, iodine, and protein relative to reference intakes, combined into a nutritional index and integrated with risk using a benefit-risk quotient (BRQ). The primary decision outputs were safe weekly consumption amounts (g/week) and the contaminant limiting factor. Across lake-species groups, mercury was the dominant constraint on safe consumption for most predatory fish, while PFAS limited selected groups with lower mercury burdens. EPA + DHA provided the strongest differentiating benefit signal between groups, whereas iodine contribution was limited because measurements were left-censored and constant after limit of quantification (LOQ) handling. This pilot demonstrates an interpretable framework for generating lake- and species-specific consumption guidance that can be updated as monitoring coverage expands.

Indexed as

EPA + DHAfreshwater fishLatviamethylmercuryomega-3PFASrisk–benefit assessmentsafe consumption

Identifiers

PMID41829176
PMCPMC12984848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.