Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41829168›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

U.S. Consumer Perceptions of Food and Pork Production Sustainability: A Cluster-Based Audience Segmentation Analysis.

Kevan W Lamm, Melvin A Newell, Alexa J Lamm, Allison R Byrd, Fally Masambuka-Kanchewa, Catherine E Sanders, Shuyang Qu, Michael S Retallick, Nicholas Gabler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kevan W LammDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5238-8842
Melvin A NewellDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA.
Alexa J LammDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-8803
Allison R ByrdDepartment of Agricultural Leadership, Education & Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-7483
Fally Masambuka-KanchewaAgricultural Education and Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0087-902X
Catherine E SandersAgricultural and Human Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5787-8752
Shuyang QuAgricultural Education and Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Michael S RetallickAgricultural Education and Studies, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9135-9515
Nicholas GablerDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7283-4782

Funding

National Pork Board Pork Checkoff
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of a sustainable food system, prior research has not empirically examined whether general food sustainability perceptions and production-specific sustainability perceptions co-occur consistently across audience segments, which is important for informing targeted communication and education strategies. The current research analyzes perceptions from an audience segmentation perspective to inform tailored communication and education strategies. Specifically, a sample of 905 adults in the United States provided perceptions of food production sustainability in general as well as pork production sustainability in particular. Responses were analyzed using a two-step cluster analysis (hierarchical/Ward's method followed by k-means) based on two sustainability indices reflecting general food sustainability importance and pork-specific sustainability. The results indicate three distinct audience segments with meaningful differences in both general food production and pork production sustainability perceptions: Food Sustainability-First (High/Moderate), Broad Sustainability Advocates (High/High), and Lower Sustainability Salience (Low/Low). Segment differences were further characterized using chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression, indicating that sex, age category, education, and metro/non-metro status contributed to segment classification, with the Broad Sustainability Advocates segment more likely to include female, metro, and higher-education respondents. The study findings indicate opportunities for segment-specific communication and education to address motivations and barriers and support transitions toward more sustainable agri-food consumption.

Indexed as

audience segmentationcluster analysisconsumer perceptionspork productionsustainabilitysustainable agri-food consumptionsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID41829168
PMCPMC12985251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.