ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
U.S. Consumer Perceptions of Food and Pork Production Sustainability: A Cluster-Based Audience Segmentation Analysis.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the importance of a sustainable food system, prior research has not empirically examined whether general food sustainability perceptions and production-specific sustainability perceptions co-occur consistently across audience segments, which is important for informing targeted communication and education strategies. The current research analyzes perceptions from an audience segmentation perspective to inform tailored communication and education strategies. Specifically, a sample of 905 adults in the United States provided perceptions of food production sustainability in general as well as pork production sustainability in particular. Responses were analyzed using a two-step cluster analysis (hierarchical/Ward's method followed by k-means) based on two sustainability indices reflecting general food sustainability importance and pork-specific sustainability. The results indicate three distinct audience segments with meaningful differences in both general food production and pork production sustainability perceptions: Food Sustainability-First (High/Moderate), Broad Sustainability Advocates (High/High), and Lower Sustainability Salience (Low/Low). Segment differences were further characterized using chi-square tests and multinomial logistic regression, indicating that sex, age category, education, and metro/non-metro status contributed to segment classification, with the Broad Sustainability Advocates segment more likely to include female, metro, and higher-education respondents. The study findings indicate opportunities for segment-specific communication and education to address motivations and barriers and support transitions toward more sustainable agri-food consumption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.