ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
How Fiscal Transfers Drive Grain Production: Empirical Evidence from 1319 Counties in China.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fiscal transfers are a key policy instrument for supporting grain production, and a systematic assessment of their effects offers a critical basis for improving the design of incentive-based grain production policies. Unlike most existing studies, which primarily examine fiscal transfers from the perspective of improving farm households' welfare and micro-level production decisions, this paper focuses on their impact on the grain production performance of major grain-producing counties, which account for over 80% of China's grain output. Utilizing panel data from 1319 county-level units in China, this study employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to evaluate the impact of the "Reward Policy for Major Grain-Producing Counties (RPMGC)", a central-to-county fiscal transfer program, on grain production. The empirical results indicate that: First, the reward policy significantly promotes grain production, and this finding remains robust across a series of robustness tests. Second, from a temporal perspective, the policy's impact follows a trend of initially increasing and then decreasing over time, suggesting that the policy effects lack long-term sustainability. Third, mechanism analysis reveals that the policy enhances grain production by fostering technological advancement, mitigating production risks, and facilitating scaled-up production. Fourth, further analysis indicates that the policy effects are more pronounced in counties located within major grain-producing regions and those experiencing higher fiscal pressure. These findings provide valuable insights for improving the design of intergovernmental grain production incentives, refining grain production incentive mechanisms, and consolidating national food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.