ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cationic and Anionic Peptides from Sheepskin Collagen as Effective Salt Substitutes for Improving the Quality of Low-Sodium Surimi Gels.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Growing demand for low-sodium surimi products has driven the search for safe salt alternatives. Anionic peptides (APPs) and cationic peptides (CPPs) were isolated from sheepskin collagen via Diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) chromatography. CPPs contained higher arginine (46.11%) and lysine (4.64%) than APPs (40.57% and 3.99%, respectively), while APPs were enriched in acidic amino acids like glutamic acid (3.88%). Comprehensive evaluations of low-salt silver carp surimi gels showed both peptides significantly improved gel strength and water-holding capacity (WHC). The water-holding capacity increased from 60.68% in the blank control group to 74.31% in the CPP-treated group, while that in the APP-treated group was 66.86%. Cooking loss was significantly reduced, decreasing from 40.64% in the blank control group to 28.57% in the CPP-treated group and 34.52% in the APP-treated group. The samples achieved a quality comparable to that of the NaCl-supplemented group, with CPP outperforming APP in terms of hardness and gel network density. The LF-NMR confirmed enhanced water retention by reducing free water (T
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.