ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Status of the Mule Deer Population in Western Sonora, Mexico.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mule deer population in Mexico declined severely during the early 20th century but recovered due to public policies centered on sport hunting. Sonora is considered the main reference for mule deer management in Mexico; however, the conservation status of the species in the state remains unclear. This study aimed to estimate the relative abundance and population structure of mule deer in Sonora. An aerial survey was conducted from 4 to 24 November 2019 using linear transects distributed across 62 sampling quadrants (30 × 30 km each). Over 82 flight hours, a total of 1376 deer were observed, with a male:female:fawn ratio of 24:100:12. The number of sightings and deer observed per quadrant followed a normal distribution, with averages of five sightings and twenty-two deer per sampling unit. The quadrants with the lowest abundance corresponded to areas containing towns and agricultural fields, whereas the areas with the highest deer numbers coincided with those containing a high concentration of Wildlife Conservation Management Units, where habitat improvement actions were implemented. The results falls within the limits of a stable population of desert mule deer; however, the low proportion of fawns suggests that limiting factors may be exerting pressure on the population. These findings highlight the importance of continued habitat management and monitoring to promote population stability and support recruitment in Sonoran mule deer populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.