Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41828800›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Biological Nanoscaffolds from Hierarchical Construction to Applications.

Yicong Zhang, Haolu Shi, Yijia Li, Yanlin Shen, Tingting Wang, Junqiu Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yicong ZhangKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0009-0006-3099-5821
Haolu ShiKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Yijia LiKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Yanlin ShenKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Tingting WangKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.
Junqiu LiuKey Laboratory of Organosilicon Chemistry and Material Technology, Ministry of Education, College of Material, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1608-7908

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China No. 2020YFA0908500Natural Science Foundation of China No. 22201058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inspired by natural scaffolds, artificial scaffolds have garnered significant attention in recent years. Compared with synthetic scaffolds such as organic and polymer scaffolds, biological scaffolds from the foundational biomolecules nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) and proteins demonstrate distinct advantages in the assembly of inorganic nanoparticles and proteins, as well as in drug delivery. These advantages stem from their exquisite spatial structures, genetically encoded programmability, and their favorable biocompatibility, which is attributed to natural building blocks and degradable backbones that minimize long-term cytotoxicity. The intrinsic properties and structural symmetry of biomacromolecules as building blocks often determine the properties of the corresponding assemblies, and thus greatly influence their functions. In this review, we classify bottom-up constructed biological scaffolds according to these two primary constituent classes (nucleic acids and proteins) to examine their framework structures and key features. We also discuss the relevant applications of artificial bioscaffolds. As an emerging class of nanomaterial with precise structures and genetic programmability, biological scaffolds hold significant promise for future development.

Indexed as

Biomimetic MaterialsNanostructuresProteinsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDNAHumansNanoparticlesNucleic AcidsBiocompatible MaterialsDNANucleic AcidsProteinsbiological nanoscaffoldbiomimeticnucleic acid scaffoldprotein assemblyprotein cageprotein scaffold

Identifiers

PMID41828800
PMCPMC12986507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.