ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Sex Differences in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical risk factors and machine learning for venous thromboembolism in lung cancer: an exploratory single-center study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncology, arising from complex interactions between tumor biology, host factors, and anticancer therapies. Growing evidence indicates that biological sex and gender-related factors modulate both thrombotic risk and clinical expression of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. In this narrative review, we summarize current epidemiological, biological, and clinical data on sex- and gender-related differences in CAT across solid and hematologic malignancies. Men generally exhibit a higher overall incidence of VTE, whereas women may experience earlier, treatment-associated thrombotic events, with variability according to cancer type, stage, and therapy. Biological factors linked to coagulation and inflammation differ between sexes and may contribute to these patterns, although mechanistic evidence remains incomplete. Sex-related disparities also emerge in treatment-associated complications, including bleeding risk and abnormal uterine bleeding in anticoagulated women of reproductive age. In contrast, evidence for sex differences in oncohematology-associated thrombosis is limited and inconsistent. Gender-related inequalities in clinical trial participation further constrain the interpretation of available data. Overall, current evidence supports sex as a clinically relevant modifier of CAT risk, underscoring the need for systematic sex- and gender-informed research, to improve mechanistic understanding, and sex-stratified reporting to advance precision medicine in thrombosis and oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.