ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Membranous Nephropathy: Antigenic Landscape and a Novel Pathogenetic Model.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membranous nephropathy is a disease that has been well documented, yet its etiopathogenesis has not been fully clarified and the distinction between its primary and secondary forms has not been completely categorized. The discovery of new antigens and antibodies reveals different percentages of positivity in secondary membranous nephropathy, which is a cause of great confusion and ambiguity not only in diagnosis but also in the choice of a therapeutic approach. The aim of this review is to summarize the literature on newly discovered antigens and antibodies, and to propose a pathogenetic model based on the role of the complement system and its activation pathways. In this model, antigens are categorized based on the type of immunoglobulin deposits and the putative complement pathways that they activate, which can help to differentiate primary from secondary membranous nephropathy. The model also reflects how the deposition of foreign antigens in the basement membrane can activate both the lectin and classical complement pathways, which may explain why positive antibodies are observed in both primary and secondary forms of membranous nephropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.