Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41828560›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Quantification Revisited: What qPCR Efficiency Models Reveal About Data Analysis Integrity.

Stephen A Bustin, Maurice J B van den Hoff, Michael W Pfaffl, Mikael Kubista, Jan M Ruijter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen A BustinMedical Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford CM1 1SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1870-6098
Maurice J B van den HoffDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3837-8055
Michael W PfafflAnimal Physiology & Immunology, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Liesel-Beckmann-Straße 1, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3192-1019
Mikael KubistaInstitute of Biotechnology CAS, Czech Academy of Science, 252 50 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-352X
Jan M RuijterDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amplification efficiency is one of the key parameters in quantitative real-time PCR, as it directly influences the accuracy of both absolute and relative quantification. Amplification efficiency, the fold increase per cycle, is affected by oligonucleotide design, reaction chemistry, sample and template properties, and instrument performance. Consequently, it differs between samples, assays and experimental runs. Although methods for estimating the amplification efficiency have been available for more than two decades, most published qPCR studies continue to assume equal and ideal efficiency across assays. This simplifying assumption introduces efficiency- and expression-dependent error into relative expression and fold-change analyses, contributing to the poor reproducibility observed in many PCR-based studies. This review examines the role of the amplification efficiency in qPCR quantification; the consequences of ignoring, assuming or misapplying efficiency; and the practical implications for data interpretation. The review also considers the development of efficiency estimation models and their implications for contemporary analytical approaches, including emerging data-driven methods for amplification curve analyses.

Indexed as

Real-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionData AnalysisHumansReproducibility of Resultsdata integritymeasurement uncertaintyPCR efficiencyqPCRquantificationreproducibilitystandard curveΔΔCq

Identifiers

PMID41828560
PMCPMC12985538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.