ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Regeneration of Spent Graphite from Lithium-Ion Batteries by Malic-Acid Leaching and Alkaline EDTA Chelation.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The electrochemical reuse of spent graphite from the negative electrodes of lithium-ion batteries is influenced by regeneration-induced changes in near-surface chemical and defect states. These states govern solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) re-formation, particularly when bulk contaminants are suppressed. Acidic malic-acid leaching and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid chelation under alkaline conditions (pH 8.7) were compared under similar operating parameters to isolate the role of the leaching environment. This was followed by heat treatment at 1200 °C to decouple chemical cleaning from structural restoration. Both methods reduced the total impurities from 217.85 ppm to ~1.8 ppm, approaching that of commercial graphite. Despite the comparable bulk purity, depth-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy after formation cycling revealed distinct outermost surface states relevant to SEI re-formation: acidic processing yielded a more oxygenated carbon signature and higher LiOH fraction at the outermost surface (~16%), whereas alkaline chelation produced a more graphitic, carbonate-dominated surface with lower LiOH (~7%). Electrochemical and impedance measurements were consistent with these differences, suggesting that after the bulk impurities were minimized, resistance development was largely governed by the leaching-conditioned near-surface state, which biased the SEI composition. The comparison under matched conditions linked the regeneration environment to SEI-relevant surface speciation and provided a mechanistic basis for selecting regeneration routes to reuse spent graphite as a negative-electrode active material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.