Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41828260›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Study on a Process Parameter-Driven Deep Learning Prediction Model for Multi-Physical Fields in Flange Shaft Welding.

Chaolong Yang, Zhiqiang Xu, Feiting Shi, Ketong Liu, Peng Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaolong YangCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Zhiqiang XuSchool of Chemical and Machinery, Liaodong University, Dandong 118001, China.
Feiting ShiSchool of Civil Engineering, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3849-3352
Ketong LiuCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
Peng CaoCollege of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-734X

Funding

Liaoning Education Department Basic Scientific Research Project LJ222511779001Liaoning Science and Technology Plan Joint Plan Project 2023JH2/101700002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large flange shafts are the core load-bearing and connecting components of high-end equipment, and their welding multi-physical fields directly affect the quality and service safety of the components. Traditional experiments and finite element methods suffer from long cycles and low efficiency, which can hardly meet the demand for rapid prediction. Aiming at the fast and accurate prediction of welding temperature, deformation and residual stress, this study combines thermal-mechanical coupled finite element simulation with machine learning to construct and compare a variety of prediction models. A dataset is built based on simulation data from 100 groups of process parameters. Overfitting is reduced through strategies including early stopping and dropout, and models such as MLP, RF, RBF-SVR, TabNet, XGBoost, and FT-Transformer are established and verified through 10-fold cross-validation. The results show that the MLP model performs best in the prediction of temperature, deformation and residual stress, and is in good agreement with the simulation values. The prediction errors of the peak temperature of the weld and base metal are below 5%, and the errors of deformation and residual stress are controlled within 10%. The average error of peak residual stress is about 6 MPa, and the deviation of most samples is less than 5 MPa. The RF model ranks second in accuracy, with an average error of about 6.5 MPa for peak residual stress, showing a satisfactory interpretability and engineering applicability. RBF-SVR and TabNet can meet basic prediction requirements. Under the small-sample condition in this work, XGBoost and FT-Transformer present relatively large errors and a weak generalization ability, making it difficult to achieve high-precision prediction. The MLP model established in this paper can effectively reproduce the evolution of welding multi-physical fields and supports the rapid prediction and process optimization of large flange shaft welding. The generalization ability and practical performance of the model can be further improved by expanding the dataset and experimental verification in the future.

Indexed as

deformationlarge flange shaftMLP deep learning modelresidual stresstemperaturewelding process parameter

Identifiers

PMID41828260
PMCPMC12985662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.