ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Low-Carbon Valorization of Construction Spoil into High-Value Recycled Aggregates for Geopolymer Concrete.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the production of recycled aggregates (RAs) derived from construction spoil (CS) and their influence on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. Two manufacturing routes, disc pelletization and crushing granulation, were employed to produce CS-based RAs. The resulting RAs were characterized in terms of particle size distribution and geopolymer compressive strength development. Geopolymer concretes incorporating disc-pelletized and crushed aggregates achieved 7-day compressive strengths of 31.0-32.5 MPa and 37.9-38.4 MPa, 21-day compressive strengths of 31.6-36.5 MPa and 40.8-41.5 MPa, 28-day compressive strengths of 36.9-37.1 MPa and 42.3-43.5 MPa, respectively. These results confirm the technical feasibility of using CS as a high-value RA resource in structural geopolymer concrete. At the same time, the approach offers environmental and economic benefits by reducing the reliance on conventional natural aggregates and lowering the associated carbon footprint. Compared with disc-pelletized RAs, crushed RAs exhibit superior performance in improving concrete compressive strength, which is attributed to their angular morphology and higher apparent density that enhance the overall structural integrity of the concrete matrix. In contrast, disc-pelletized RAs display higher porosity and smoother surfaces, which tend to induce stress concentration and thus reduce the mechanical performance of geopolymer concrete. Overall, the findings provide practical guidance for the valorization of construction spoil through RAs production. They demonstrate that crushed CS-derived RAs can effectively replace natural aggregates in structural concrete, thereby mitigating the impacts of aggregate mining and contributing to circular economy and low-carbon construction objectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.