Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41828170›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Stress Corrosion Cracking: Mechanisms, Materials Challenges, and Engineering Solutions.

Lincoln Pinoski, Subin Antony Jose, Pradeep L Menezes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lincoln PinoskiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Subin Antony JoseDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Pradeep L MenezesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8030-8504

Funding

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission 31310024M0008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress corrosion cracking (SCC) is a critical failure mechanism that arises from the synergistic interaction between tensile stress and corrosive environments, leading to sudden and often catastrophic failures in structural components across various industries, including aerospace, nuclear energy, oil and gas, and marine engineering. This review synthesizes current understanding of SCC mechanisms, including film rupture and anodic dissolution, hydrogen embrittlement, and adsorption-induced cleavage, and evaluates material susceptibility across steels, aluminum alloys, nickel-based alloys, titanium, and emerging high-entropy alloys. Environmental factors such as aqueous chemistry, temperature, pressure, pH, and dissolved gases are examined for their roles in SCC initiation and propagation. Advanced testing methodologies, including slow strain rate testing, bent-beam configurations, electrochemical monitoring, and high-resolution microscopy, are discussed for characterizing SCC behavior. Engineering mitigation strategies are presented, encompassing material selection, stress reduction, surface treatments, and environmental control. Case studies illustrate real-world SCC failures and inform best practices. Emerging trends highlight the potential of machine learning for predictive maintenance and the development of SCC-resistant materials through additive manufacturing and microstructural engineering. This comprehensive review provides mechanical engineers with actionable insights for designing, maintaining, and safeguarding components against SCC in demanding service environments.

Indexed as

electrochemical characterizationenvironmental degradationhigh entropy alloysmechanical integritystress corrosion cracking

Identifiers

PMID41828170
PMCPMC12986410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.