ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparison of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods for Gingival Thickness Assessment: Color-Coded Probe Versus Ultrasound Measurements.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Baseline-Dependent Biological Response to Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate assessment of gingival thickness is essential for clinical decision-making in implant dentistry, periodontology, and orthodontics. Qualitative phenotype assessment using color-coded periodontal probes is commonly applied as a rapid screening tool, whereas ultrasonography provides quantitative, non-invasive measurements expressed in millimeters. The relationship between these two approaches, however, remains insufficiently defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correspondence between qualitative gingival phenotype classification using a color-coded probe and quantitative soft tissue thickness measured with an ultrasound-based system. In this observational diagnostic substudy, the gingival phenotype was categorized as thin, medium, thick, or very thick based on probe translucency and compared with ultrasound-derived thickness values obtained at standardized sites. Qualitative phenotype categories showed a consistent association with quantitative measurements, supporting the role of color-coded probes as screening tools within a complementary diagnostic framework. Ultrasonography provided objective data suitable for detailed assessment and monitoring. These findings support a complementary diagnostic approach combining qualitative screening with quantitative measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.