ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sound-Based Tool Wear Classification in Turning of AISI 316L Using Multidomain Acoustic Features and SHAP-Enhanced Gradient Boosting Models.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable tool-wear monitoring is essential for maintaining machining quality and preventing unscheduled downtime in manufacturing. This investigation presents a sound-based classification framework for identifying wear states in the turning of AISI 316L stainless steel using advanced gradient-boosting models. Acoustic signals were recorded under constant cutting parameters to eliminate process-induced variability, and each recording was divided into standardized 2 s segments. A total of 540 multidomain features-including RMS, ZCR, spectral descriptors, Mel-spectrogram statistics, MFCCs and their derivatives, and discrete wavelet energies-were extracted to capture both stationary and transient characteristics of tool-workpiece interactions. Feature selection was performed using a three-stage pipeline comprising Boruta, LASSO, and SHAP analysis, resulting in a compact subset of highly informative descriptors. LightGBM, XGBoost, and CatBoost classifiers were trained using stratified 10-fold cross-validation across three wear states: Unworn, Slight wear, and Severe wear. LightGBM and XGBoost achieved the best performance, with mean accuracies above 0.96 and strong PRC-AUC and ROC-AUC values (0.98-1.00). Although Slight wear remained the most difficult class due to its transitional acoustic characteristics, all models showed clear separability for Unworn and Severe wear conditions. The results confirm that boosted decision-tree methods combined with SHAP-enhanced feature selection provide an effective, low-cost, and non-contact solution for tool-wear classification in 316L turning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.