ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges in Rare and Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rare Implantation Sites of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Case Series of Ovarian and Hepatic Pregnancy and Review of Diagnostic Challenges.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In relation to the most commonly described ampullary ectopic pregnancies in contemporary gynecological practice, rare localizations of ectopic pregnancies represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge whose clinical significance far exceeds their frequency. In contrast to tubal ectopic pregnancy, these implantation localizations are characterized by specific anatomical relationships and early trophoblastic invasion into highly vascularized tissues, which is why classical diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic patterns are often not applicable in clinical practice. Clinical uncertainty is further increased by the fact that a large proportion of these pregnancies in early gestation cannot be precisely mapped and initially present as pregnancies of unknown location. This narrative review integrates contemporary evidence and guidelines of relevant professional societies with the aim of highlighting patterns of diagnostic errors, systemic weaknesses of existing approaches, and key points for safe clinical decision-making. Special emphasis is placed on the role of disciplined transvaginal ultrasound evaluation, terminological precision, and timely recognition of high-risk and nonspecific implantations. Analysis of the available literature indicates that therapeutic decisions must be individualized and guided by the implantation site and assessment of hemorrhagic risk, rather than gestational age or absolute β-hCG values. Understanding these principles represents the basis for reducing serious complications and for the development of future diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms, thereby improving treatment outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.