Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41828046›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bifurcated Networks for Breast Density & Cancer Risk: A Technical Framework.

Graziella Di Grezia, Teresa Iannaccone, Antonio Nazzaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Graziella Di GreziaDepartment of Life Sciences, Health and Healthcare Professions, Link Campus University, Via del Casale di S. Pio V, 44, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4507-3505
Teresa IannacconeIndependent Researcher, 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Antonio NazzaroIndependent Researcher, 83100 Avellino, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-1463-8940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveBreast density and cancer risk are key imaging-derived biomarkers, yet their assessment is limited by inter-reader variability and inconsistent reproducibility. This Technical Note evaluates the feasibility of a bifurcated neural network designed to simultaneously predict breast density and a composite cancer risk index, providing a methodological foundation for future integration into contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) workflows. MATERIALS AND

methodsA simulated cohort of 1000 patients was generated to reproduce clinically plausible variability in breast density (Densitanum) and cancer risk (RiskEnum). A multi-output neural network was developed and compared with two baselines: multiple linear regression and a single-output multilayer perceptron (MLP). Performance was assessed using R

resultsLinear regression showed limited explanatory power (R

conclusionsThis simulation-based feasibility study demonstrates that bifurcated neural networks can jointly model correlated breast imaging biomarkers with high internal consistency. The proposed architecture provides a reproducible methodological platform that can be directly tested on real CEM datasets to support future AI-enhanced risk stratification and personalized screening pathways.

Indexed as

breast densitycancer risk predictioncontrast-enhanced mammographyimaging biomarkersmulti-task learningneural networksrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID41828046
PMCPMC12984523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.