Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827996›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Role of Endoscopy in Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Ishaan Vohra, Burraq Imran, Zubair Khan, Muhammad Hasan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ishaan VohraDepartment of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine Peoria, Peoria, IL 61605, USA.
Burraq ImranUniversity of Exeter Medical School, Exeter EX1 2HZ, UK.
Zubair KhanAdventHealth, Orlando, FL 32803, USA.
Muhammad HasanAdventHealth, Orlando, FL 32803, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-7386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) represents a critical clinical challenge characterized by bile duct compromise leading to severe complications, including intractable jaundice, recurrent cholangitis, biliary cirrhosis, and hepatic failure. Classification into distal MBO (DMBO) and hilar MBO (HMBO) guides therapeutic decision-making, with the former predominantly caused by pancreatic head adenocarcinoma and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, while perihilar cholangiocarcinoma represents the principal etiology of the latter. The high morbidity and mortality associated with MBO necessitate prompt, expert intervention. While endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary biliary drainage (TBD) has traditionally served as the cornerstone of management for unresectable tumors, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has emerged as a compelling alternative, particularly when conventional ERCP proves technically unsuccessful or anatomically unfeasible. This review comprehensively examines current endoscopic strategies for MBO, emphasizing the complementary roles of ERCP and EUS-based techniques. Optimal outcomes require intervention by experienced endoscopists at high-volume tertiary centers, with individualized treatment selection based on anatomical considerations, tumor characteristics, patient factors, and local expertise.

Indexed as

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyendoscopic ultrasoundendoscopymalignant biliary obstructiontranspapillary biliary drainage

Identifiers

PMID41827996
PMCPMC12984430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.