Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827976›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology-An Illustration Using Radiomics.

Florian van Daalen, Balu Krishna Sasidharan, C Praveenraj, Amal Joseph Varghese, Andre Dekker, Leonard Wee, Rianne Fijten, Aparna Irodi, Hannah Mary T Thomas

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Florian van DaalenDepartment of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2229-8587
Balu Krishna SasidharanQuantitative Imaging Research and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 2, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore 632004, India.
C PraveenrajQuantitative Imaging Research and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 2, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore 632004, India.ORCID 0009-0007-3755-6028
Amal Joseph VargheseQuantitative Imaging Research and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 2, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore 632004, India.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0422-7996
Leonard WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-9055
Rianne FijtenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aparna IrodiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore 632004, India.
Hannah Mary T ThomasQuantitative Imaging Research and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Department of Radiation Oncology, Unit 2, Christian Medical College Vellore, Vellore 632004, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1454-512X

Funding

DBT Wellcome Trust India Alliance lA/E/18/1/504306Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While AI models are developed in oncology for predicting different clinical outcomes, the focus is often on accuracy and many fail to adequately communicate the degree of certainty in these predictions. To improve clinical decision-making in oncology, this work introduces the idea of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for AI models using an illustrative example. Our goal is to help radiologists and oncologists better understand prediction reliability by integrating UQ. Our illustrative example is a Radiomics Risk Model (RM) for Thymic Epithelial Tumours, developed to provide a basic understanding of the mechanism to evaluate the degree to which individual patient data matches the training set. The study demonstrates the concept of measuring uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AI) models using a simple example of distance measures within the feature space and example cases where uncertainty is addressed with probable causes. The paper highlights specifically where the clinicians may need more information to improve their confidence in their AI-driven assessments for clinical diagnostics.

Indexed as

aleatoricepistemicradiomicsthymic epithelial tumoursuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID41827976
PMCPMC12985193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.