ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Decoding Uncertainty Quantification for Oncology-An Illustration Using Radiomics.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While AI models are developed in oncology for predicting different clinical outcomes, the focus is often on accuracy and many fail to adequately communicate the degree of certainty in these predictions. To improve clinical decision-making in oncology, this work introduces the idea of uncertainty quantification (UQ) for AI models using an illustrative example. Our goal is to help radiologists and oncologists better understand prediction reliability by integrating UQ. Our illustrative example is a Radiomics Risk Model (RM) for Thymic Epithelial Tumours, developed to provide a basic understanding of the mechanism to evaluate the degree to which individual patient data matches the training set. The study demonstrates the concept of measuring uncertainty in artificial intelligence (AI) models using a simple example of distance measures within the feature space and example cases where uncertainty is addressed with probable causes. The paper highlights specifically where the clinicians may need more information to improve their confidence in their AI-driven assessments for clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.