ReviewCells2026
Immune Ageing Clocks: A Methods-Oriented Review of Tasks, Modalities, Models, and Recalibration.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Population ageing and the growing burden of immune-mediated disease have prompted efforts to quantify immunosenescence with clinically usable biomarkers. Immune ageing clocks have been built from immunophenotyping, transcriptomics, proteomics, epigenomics and adaptive receptor repertoires, but heterogeneous task definitions, assay protocols and evaluation criteria limit comparability and translation. We review major immune data modalities and outline an end-to-end workflow from cohort design and assay standardisation to preprocessing, feature engineering, model development, validation and recalibration. We propose a task-modality-model taxonomy separating (i) chronological age clocks, (ii) outcome-anchored risk clocks and (iii) cell lineage/state clocks, while treating bulk blood transcriptomics (whole blood or PBMC) as a molecular-layer modality that can support either age-scale or outcome-anchored tasks depending on supervision. Across studies, common limitations include batch effects, compositional confounding, endpoint mismatch, scarce external validation and limited mechanistic anchoring. We conclude with priorities for the field, including multimodal integration, longitudinal designs with digital phenotypes, tissue- and cell-type-specific models, and pathway-grounded clocks that can be linked to interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.