ReviewCancers2026
A Silent Saboteur of Immunotherapy: Antibiotic Use and Its Impact on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Studies.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From oral dysbiosis to colorectal cancer: reframing fusobacterium nucleatum as an oxidative stress-primed oncobion.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the management of solid tumors, yet only a subset of patients achieve durable benefit. The gut microbiota is a key modulator of antitumor immunity, and systemic antibiotic therapy (ABT), frequently prescribed-and sometimes overused-in oncology, can profoundly disrupt microbial homeostasis. Observational studies suggest that ABT may impair ICI efficacy, but results remain heterogeneous, warranting an updated synthesis.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 2018 and 2025 evaluating the association between ABT exposure and time-to-event outcomes in patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs. Studies were required to report explicit definition of the ABT exposure window. Random-effects models were considered primary. A sensitivity analysis was performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
resultsFifteen studies encompassing 52,489 patients were included. ABT exposure was associated with significantly worse OS (random-effects HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.29) and PFS (random-effects HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.95-1.27), indicating an increased risk of death and disease progression compared with no ABT exposure. In the NSCLC sensitivity analysis, ABT was consistently associated with inferior PFS and, when accounting for heterogeneity, with significantly reduced OS, supporting the robustness of the association.
conclusionsABT administered in temporal proximity to ICIs is associated with clinically meaningful worsening of survival outcomes across solid tumors, consistent with microbiome-mediated impairment of immunotherapy efficacy. These findings support cautious ABT stewardship in patients receiving ICIs and highlight the need for prospective studies integrating microbiome profiling and standardized ABT exposure assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.