Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827793›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Translating Molecular Insights into Effective Targeting of Glioblastoma Stem Cells.

Shilpi Singh, Deepak Singh Kapkoti, Gatikrushna Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shilpi SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9938-7043
Deepak Singh KapkotiCSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants, Lucknow 226015, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7005-3368
Gatikrushna SinghDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9870-5556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) function as dynamic regulators of tumor persistence, maintained by interconnected genetic, epigenetic, metabolic, and microenvironment-derived circuits. Rather than fixed entities, GSCs continuously recalibrate their functional state as transcriptional regulators, chromatin architecture, and non-coding RNA networks shift in response to microenvironmental cues. Hypoxic, vascular, and immune niches reinforce these adaptive states by stabilizing HIF signaling, modulating cytokine gradients, and sustaining immunosuppression. Metabolic flexibility further supports survival under therapeutic and environmental stress. Standard therapies inadvertently activate these same resilience pathways: TMZ enhances DNA repair and quiescent survival, while radiation promotes mesenchymal transition and immune evasion, thereby enriching GSC-associated circuits that drive recurrence. Understanding how these molecular circuits converge to sustain stemness, plasticity, and microenvironmental crosstalk highlights the need for combinatorial strategies that simultaneously disrupt epigenetic gating, metabolic rewiring, ncRNA-controlled repair, and niche-dependent signaling to achieve durable glioblastoma control.

Indexed as

glioblastoma stem cellsnon-coding RNAtherapeutic resistancetumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41827793
PMCPMC12985190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.