ArticleCancers2026
Active Versus Passive Infrared Thermography for Skin Cancer Detection: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Article in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInfrared thermography has emerged as a non-invasive imaging modality capable of capturing physiological alterations associated with skin cancer; however, its diagnostic utility remains insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of active (cooling-induced) and passive infrared thermography in distinguishing benign from malignant skin lesions.
methodsIn this clinical study conducted at Barretos Cancer Hospital, 64 individuals contributed 100 skin lesions, of which 68 (56 malignant, 12 benign) met criteria for diagnostic accuracy analysis. Long-wave infrared images were acquired under steady-state conditions (passive thermography) and after standardized cooling (active thermography). Diagnostic performance was assessed using thermal contrast patterns and temperature differentials (Δ
resultsActive thermography markedly outperformed passive imaging. Active thermography achieved a sensitivity of 91.1% and specificity of 75.0%, whereas passive thermography demonstrated low sensitivity (17.9%) despite perfect specificity (100%). Malignant lesions displayed substantially higher Δ
conclusionsActive infrared thermography enhances thermal contrast and provides significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with passive imaging. As a low-cost, non-invasive technique, active thermography shows promise as a complementary tool for skin cancer triage, particularly in settings with limited access to dermatologic evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.