Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827708›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

ER-Negative Endometrial Cancers: An Evolving Diagnostic Category with Major Clinical Implications.

Rujia Fan, Xiaowei Wei, Jayanthi Lea, Huiting Zhu, Wenxin Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rujia FanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Xiaowei WeiDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Jayanthi LeaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8657-4309
Huiting ZhuDepartment of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Wenxin ZhengDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4284-2893

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptor-negative (ER-negative) endometrial carcinomas represent an emerging and historically underrecognized diagnostic concept encompassing a biologically aggressive and heterogeneous subset of endometrial cancers. Although loss of ER expression is increasingly recognized as an adverse prognostic indicator, ER negativity alone is insufficient for precise classification and must be interpreted within a histotype-specific and molecularly informed context. In this commentary, we review the evolving role of ER negativity in endometrial carcinoma through an integrated morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular framework, emphasizing both pathogenetic insights and practical diagnostic considerations. We highlight specific high-grade ER-negative tumor entities that merit particular diagnostic attention, including endometrial gastrointestinal-type adenocarcinoma, pilomatrix-like high-grade endometrial carcinoma, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, endometrial clear cell carcinoma, and ER-negative high-grade carcinomas not otherwise specified. These tumors exhibit distinct morphologic features and marked molecular heterogeneity that cannot be captured by hormone receptor status alone. Key diagnostic clues and common pitfalls are discussed, underscoring a practical workflow in which ER negativity serves as a diagnostic signal rather than a terminal category. Improved recognition and subclassification of ER-negative endometrial carcinomas are essential for accurate diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and optimized clinical management.

Indexed as

endometrial gastrointestinal-type adenocarcinomaestrogen receptor–negative (ER-negative) endometrial carcinomasmesonephric-like adenocarcinomapilomatrix-like high-grade endometrial carcinomaPiMHEC

Identifiers

PMID41827708
PMCPMC12984684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.