ReviewCancers2026
ER-Negative Endometrial Cancers: An Evolving Diagnostic Category with Major Clinical Implications.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MUC16 promotes endometrial cancer progression and modulates sensitivity to lapatinib through the ESR1/PI3K/AKT axis.Translational oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogen receptor-negative (ER-negative) endometrial carcinomas represent an emerging and historically underrecognized diagnostic concept encompassing a biologically aggressive and heterogeneous subset of endometrial cancers. Although loss of ER expression is increasingly recognized as an adverse prognostic indicator, ER negativity alone is insufficient for precise classification and must be interpreted within a histotype-specific and molecularly informed context. In this commentary, we review the evolving role of ER negativity in endometrial carcinoma through an integrated morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular framework, emphasizing both pathogenetic insights and practical diagnostic considerations. We highlight specific high-grade ER-negative tumor entities that merit particular diagnostic attention, including endometrial gastrointestinal-type adenocarcinoma, pilomatrix-like high-grade endometrial carcinoma, mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma, endometrial clear cell carcinoma, and ER-negative high-grade carcinomas not otherwise specified. These tumors exhibit distinct morphologic features and marked molecular heterogeneity that cannot be captured by hormone receptor status alone. Key diagnostic clues and common pitfalls are discussed, underscoring a practical workflow in which ER negativity serves as a diagnostic signal rather than a terminal category. Improved recognition and subclassification of ER-negative endometrial carcinomas are essential for accurate diagnosis, prognostic stratification, and optimized clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.