ReviewCancers2026
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Natural Product Discovery for Cancer Metastasis and Chemoresistance: From Computational Prediction to Preclinical Validation.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Metabolomics, Network Pharmacology, and Molecular Dynamics Simulations Reveal the Potential Anti-Melanoma Mechanisms ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Across the Drug Development Lifecycle.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer metastasis and chemoresistance are primary reasons for cancer-related mortality. Current therapeutic options rely mostly on single-target drugs, which often fail to exhibit long-lasting remission of the disease progression due to the complexity of metastasis and resistance mechanisms. Natural products (NPs) possess inherent structural diversity, rendering them suitable as multi-target agents. The utilization of NPs is often impeded in treating complex diseases such as cancer, even though approximately 65% of approved anticancer drugs are NP derivatives, or synthetic derivatives containing NP-pharmacophores, due to various factors, including poor aqueous solubility and variable oral bioavailability, structural complexity, synthetic inaccessibility, and stereochemical diversity that confounds structure-activity relationship analyses. This review discusses how integrating artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) with chemoinformatics can identify, prioritize, and experimentally validate NPs, potentially paving the way for new drugs that address intricate processes such as metastasis and resistance. We summarize the recent computational advances in the field, including graph neural networks, attention mechanisms, Siamese networks, virtual screening, and network pharmacology. These advancements address ADMET optimization, molecular representation, virtual screening, network pharmacology, and experimental validation. We emphasize how each of these approaches tackles the unique challenges associated with NPs. We contextualize our review within the specific challenges presented by the chemical space of NPs. Additionally, we analyze real-world case studies of successful AI-assisted NP discovery and categorize the quality of evidence into three levels: Level A, which includes in vivo efficacy with mechanistic details; Level B, which consists of in vitro validation of mechanisms and phenotypes; and Level C, which represents computational hypotheses that are awaiting experimental verification. Additionally, we propose an operational framework for selecting suitable AI methodologies based on available data, target characterization, and validation resources. Finally, we emphasize the limitations and future directions in AI-facilitated NP discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.