ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
User-Centred Interaction Design for Enhancing Professional Well-Being in Healthcare Environments.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAdoption of user-centred design methods is essential in healthcare applications because it ensures that complex workflows are shaped around real users' needs and behaviours, improving usability, accessibility, and sustainability. The use of user-centred design in healthcare applications still presents open challenges for identifying user requirements, including diverse stakeholder needs, limited user availability, complex interaction workflows, and organizational constraints. To address these challenges, this paper proposes a user-centred interaction design framework that systematically supports the identification and translation of user needs into actionable design requirements.
methodsThe framework integrates user-centred design principles with generative tools, employing the Persona-and-Scenario method to transform user insights into actionable design requirements. By actively involving healthcare stakeholders, the framework ensures that both explicit and latent needs are captured.
resultsThe framework was implemented through two co-design events, which provided valuable feedback on data collection, visualization, interaction modalities, and privacy considerations. These insights were translated into functional, usability, and interface requirements for the Change Management Platform (CMP) for the KEEPCARING project.
conclusionsThis framework introduces a structured, scenario-driven process that actively engages stakeholders in envisioning future states rather than merely refining existing systems. Its application demonstrates promising indications that it enhances requirement elicitation, promotes cross-stakeholder alignment, and yields higher-quality, contextually relevant design requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.