ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026
Periodization in Orthobiologics Rehabilitation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orthobiologic treatments such as platelet-rich plasma and stem cell therapies are increasingly used to support the healing of tendons, ligaments, and joints. This perspective proposes applying periodization-a structured, progressive model borrowed from athletic training-to rehabilitation following orthobiologic interventions in order to improve functional outcomes. The framework is organized into sequential phases that align with biological stages of healing. Early phases emphasize pain control, inflammation management, and safe, controlled mobility. Rehabilitation then progresses toward gradually increasing load bearing and strength, and toward more specific exercises to promote tissue regeneration while reducing the risk of re-injury. In later phases (mesocycles), the model highlights the importance of neuroplastic adaptations for sustained functional recovery, including neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and functional remodeling to safer RTP for athletes. A key advantage of this approach is its adaptability: progression can be individualized according to a patient's recovery trajectory and response to loading. By aligning rehabilitation progression with intrinsic healing processes and integrating physiological and neuromuscular goals, the proposed model aims to maximize regenerative potential across both athletic and non-athletic populations. Overall, this neuroplastic periodized approach offers a practical, evidence-informed structure to guide clinicians in delivering patient-centered regenerative rehabilitation and may help standardize care after orthobiologic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.