ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Seizure Clusters: Current Concepts in Definition and Treatment.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- YouTube Videos as Educational Resources for Seizure Clusters and Treatment Options: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seizure clusters (SCs) are an acute and transient increase in seizure frequency relative to an individual patient's baseline and are associated with an increased risk of injury, morbidity, and potentially mortality if not promptly and adequately treated. Despite their clinical importance, the management of SCs remains highly heterogeneous, primarily due to the absence of a universally accepted definition, which is determined also by the wide variability in seizure semiology and baseline individual burden;, as well as by differences in care settings. Outpatient treatment relies largely on caregivers' ability to recognize SCs and administer rescue medication, whereas inpatient management may also involve invasive routes of administration. We conducted a literature review identifying 32 original articles addressing the treatment of SCs. The analysis focused on definitions, efficacy outcomes, and adverse events across three clinical scenarios: outpatient, Emergency Department (EDs) and Epilepsy Monitoring Units. The results show that in the outpatient setting, the available evidence suggests that diazepam nasal spray (DZP-NS), midazolam nasal spray (MDZ-NS), and oral lorazepam (LZP) solution may demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety. However, comparisons are limited by heterogeneity in studies' designs, patient populations and outcome definitions, as well as by the absence of head-to-head trials. Moreover, geographic differences in drug availability (e.g., USA vs. Europe) limit the development of universally applicable treatment protocols. Consequently, the off-label use of oral benzodiazepines, including clobazam, clonazepam, and lorazepam, remains common when oral therapy is feasible, despite limited evidence. The implementation of a patient-specific Acute Seizure Action Plan (ASAP) incorporating an individualized SC definition is recommended. In contrast, inpatient management shows greater consensus, largely reflecting first-line treatment paradigms for status epilepticus. These include prompt intravenous benzodiazepine administration, followed by the intravenous loading of antiseizure medications such as brivaracetam or lacosamide in cases of seizure recurrence. In ED settings, "empirical" definitions of SCs (i.e., more than three seizures within 24 h) may facilitate timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.