Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827241›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2026

Introducing the Universal Periprosthetic Femur Fracture (UPFF) Classification: All Fractures Femur.

Edward J McPherson, Madhav Chowdhry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward J McPhersonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90404, USA.
Madhav ChowdhryDepartment of Continuing Education, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JA, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0769-0326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peri-Prosthetic Femur Fractures (PPFFs) are occurring with increasing frequency as the incidence of hip and knee arthroplasty is rising globally. PPFFs are presenting with more complex patterns commensurate with the increasing sophistication of implant technology and surgical technique. Moreover, with patients undergoing arthroplasty procedures at a younger mean age, it is not uncommon to see both ipsilateral implants (hip and knee) being affected by the fracture. Previous classifications have separated PPFFs into the hip or knee regions, and most do not include fracture patterns about revision-style implants. Prior schemes are antiquated and are not applicable to all current fracture patterns. We present a codified anthropometric, rule-based staging system that incorporates PPFFs across the entire femur. This system is designed to standardize communication and capture variables relevant to treatment planning and future research analysis. Formal reliability and clinical validation studies are ongoing.

Indexed as

arthroplastyclassificationfemurfracturehipkneeperiprosthetictrauma

Identifiers

PMID41827241
PMCPMC12986086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.