ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2026
The result prediction of fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer patients based on machine learning and deep learning models: a multicenter study.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and validate a multicenter ultrasound-based predictive model for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results in HER2 (2+) breast cancer patients, aiming to provide a convenient and cost-effective tool to support clinical decision-making. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective multicenter study, 5,888 breast cancer patients from six institutions were included. Radiomics features were extracted from ultrasound images using PyRadiomics, and deep learning features were obtained using a Vision Transformer (ViT). Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Multiple machine learning models were developed, and their performance was evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC). The DeLong test was used for model comparison.
resultsThe proportion of FISH-positive cases ranged from 9.7% to 20.0% across the six centers. The fusion model combining ViT and radiomics signatures consistently outperformed the individual models in the training, test, and all external validation cohorts. The AUCs of the fusion model were 0.887 in the training cohort, 0.799 in the test cohort, and 0.763, 0.796, 0.734, and 0.632 in the four external validation cohorts, respectively (all P < 0.05).
conclusionThe proposed ultrasound-based fusion model enables accurate prediction of FISH assay results in HER2 (2+) breast cancer patients and may serve as a reliable decision-support tool to reduce unnecessary FISH testing in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.