Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827044›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

From executive control to social emotions: mediation analysis of theory of mind linking executive functions to envy but not Schadenfreude.

Daniel Franco-O Byrne, Tamara Andrea Cavalieri Ortiz, David Huepe Artigas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Franco-O Byrne *Latin American Brain Health Institute (BrainLat), Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
Tamara Andrea Cavalieri Ortiz *School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile.
David Huepe ArtigasCenter for Social and Cognitive Neuroscience (CSCN), School of Psychology, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Santiago, Chile. david.huepe@uai.cl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplex social emotions such as envy and Schadenfreude require the integration of high-level cognitive processes, particularly Executive Functions (EFs) and Theory of Mind (ToM). However, little is known about how these factors differentially influence the intensity of these emotions.

methodsOne hundred and three individuals were assessed using the Ineco Frontal Screening (IFS), the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and the Social Emotion Task for envy and Schadenfreude. Correlation and mediation analyses were employed to examine the relationships among EFs, ToM, and the intensity of these emotions.

resultsEFs were significantly associated with both envy and Schadenfreude, as well as with ToM. In contrast, ToM was associated only with envy. Mediation analyses indicated that ToM mediated the relationship between EFs and envy, but not Schadenfreude.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that envy and Schadenfreude might be supported by partially distinct cognitive mechanisms: envy seems to rely on cognitive and sociocognitive processes, whereas Schadenfreude is primarily linked to evaluative and reward-related processes. This highlights the presence of differential cognitive profiles underlying complex social emotions.

Indexed as

EmotionsExecutive FunctionJealousyTheory of MindAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMediation AnalysisYoung AdultenvyExecutive FunctionsSchadenfreudeTheory of Mind

Identifiers

PMID41827044
PMCPMC13097717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.