Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827041›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Examining the association between food addiction, stress, and social competence.

Aybala Tazeoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aybala TazeogluDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Karacaoğlan Campus, Osmaniye, 80000, Türkiye. aybalatazeoglu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4144-8456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood addiction (FA) is characterized by loss of control over rewarding foods, intense cravings, and persistent consumption. The aim of this study was to determine the association of FA with stress and social competence levels in adults. MATERIAL –

methodsYoung adult participants were included in the study. Participants were selected randomly. Sociodemographic data and anthropometric measurements were recorded. The Perceived Social Competence Scale (PSCS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), and Modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (mYFAS-2.0) were administered. Groups were compared according to the presence of FA. Correlations among the scales were examined.

resultsA total of 1,608 participants were included in the study. The mean age was 33.15 ± 5.47 years. FA was present in 137 participants (8.5%). Among those with FA, 48 (35.1%) had mild, 72 (52.6%) had moderate, and 17 (12.3%) had severe FA. Significant differences were observed across FA subgroups in body weight, body mass index (BMI), mean PSCS, PSS-14, and mYFAS-2.0 scores, as well as in female sex, self-evaluation of body weight, satisfaction with body weight, and dieting history in the past year. A moderate correlation was found between mYFAS-2.0 and PSS-14 (r = 0.59). A strong negative correlation was found between mYFAS-2.0 and PSCS (r = − 0.74).

conclusionFood addiction (FA) showed a moderate positive correlation with stress and a strong negative correlation with social competence. FA severity showed associations with sex, BMI, stress, social competence, and individuals’ self-evaluation of their body weight.

Indexed as

Food AddictionSocial SkillsStress, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleSubjective StressYoung AdultFood addictionRisk factorsSocial competenceStress

Identifiers

PMID41827041
PMCPMC13097928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.