ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2026
Recess and after-hours behavior patterns associated with community schoolyard transformations.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpending time in nature and physical activity are both linked to better health outcomes for children. School environments provide the potential for multiple interventions to promote healthy behaviors. Transforming these existing public spaces to serve broader activity functions provides opportunities to support healthy child development and to increase nature access for local communities.
methodsOur quasi-experimental design capitalized on a community-engaged schoolyard redesign and redevelopment project completed at two elementary schools in Tacoma, Washington, USA, led by the Trust for Public Land. Renovations included painting paved surfaces, installation of new play structures, adding walking paths and log seating areas, and planting trees. We used a validated momentary time sampling observational tool, the System for Observing Outdoor Play Environments in Neighborhood schools (SOOPEN), before and after for two schools undergoing the transformation and a control school. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and within-group behaviors in the schoolyard were observed. We used a difference-in-difference approach to estimate the effect of the schoolyard renovation on behavior during recess, and on community use of the schoolyard outside of school hours.
resultsThe schoolyard transformation was associated with a 1.51-times greater increase (95% CI: 0.95, 2.40) in MVPA during recess at intervention schools compared to the control school, although this association was only statistically significant among groups of boys. After renovation, MVPA was highest in grassy areas at one school (69%), but highest in paved zones with newly painted markings at the other (75%). Renovations were not associated with changes in the prevalence of prosocial behavior during recess, which was high at baseline. The schoolyard transformation was also associated with increased community use outside of school hours, especially for groups of children (5.8-times [95% CI: 1.4, 23.8] greater increase in use over time at renovation schools compared to the control school).
conclusionsSchoolyard transformations have the potential to increase schoolyard use and physical activity both during and outside of school hours, if campuses are open to community use. Additional rigorous research can inform future projects to support the health of school-age children and address inequities in distribution of community greenspaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.