Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41827024›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2026

German rehabilitation after total hip or knee arthroplasty through Dutch eyes: a qualitative focus group pilot study.

Yvet Mooiweer, Gesine H Seeber, Manna Alma, Annemiek Kuipers, Mike Keasberry, Sophie Thölken, Martin Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yvet MooiweerDepartment of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. yvet.mooiweer@uni-oldenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-9472
Gesine H SeeberDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3343-9151
Manna AlmaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8203-2713
Annemiek KuipersDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mike KeasberryDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sophie ThölkenReha-Zentrum am Meer, Bad Zwischenahn, Germany.
Martin StevensDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8183-6894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to learn from the experiences of patients who have undergone medical rehabilitation following hip or knee arthroplasty in the Netherlands and Germany. A qualitative focus group study was conducted among Dutch revision total hip and knee arthroplasty patients who had experience with initial rehabilitation in the Netherlands plus inpatient rehabilitation in Germany as part of the ‘Common Care’ pilot project. The focus group was recorded, transcribed verbatim and pseudonymised. A thematic analysis using an inductive approach was performed. Five patients and two family members joined the focus group. Analysis revealed five themes: language, location, therapy content, outcomes and structure. Content-wise, therapy, outcomes and structure of rehabilitation in Germany were perceived as more beneficial. In terms of location and language, patients favoured the Dutch approach. Participants generally expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the German rehabilitation trajectory versus the Dutch. The German approach’s main advantages were the more extensive therapy content and supervision plus a feeling of faster recovery, the Dutch were the home-sweet-home feeling, language and travel distance. Future research should further evaluate effects of rehabilitation policies especially on return to work.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneePatient SatisfactionAgedFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPilot ProjectsQualitative Researchhip replacement; knee replacement; revision arthroplasty; care pathway; qualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41827024
PMCPMC13064102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.