Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826981›Full record

ArticleCell communication and signaling : CCS2026

Diverse genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma between exon 19 del and exon 21 L858R.

Yuwen Yang, Sitan Qiao, Dongchen Sun, Zhonghan Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhao, Jianhua Zhan, Yan Huang, Hongyun Zhao, Yunpeng Yang, Kui Wu and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell communication and signaling : CCS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yuwen Yang *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Sitan Qiao *BGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Dongchen Sun *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhonghan Zhang *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yuanyuan Zhao *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jianhua Zhan *Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yan HuangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hongyun ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yunpeng YangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kui WuState Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, BGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Xinlan ZhouState Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, BGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China.
Lanjun ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Hao LongDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Haoxian YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Junye WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xin WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Zhesheng WenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. zhangli@sysucc.org.cn.
Wenfeng FangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. fangwf@sysucc.org.cn.
Xin ZhaoBGI Research, Shenzhen, 518083, China. zhaoxin@genomics.cn.
Yaxiong ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China. zhangyx@sysucc.org.cn.

Funding

Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project Grant No. 82102872Chinese National Natural Science Foundation project Grant No. 82241232Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundatio 2025A04J3547Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2024ZD0519700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe exon 19 deletion (19 Del) and the exon 21 L858R point mutation (21 L858R) are two main subtypes of EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with distinct response to targeted treatment and immunotherapy. Understanding the intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) of EGFR-mutant LUAD may explain the reason.

methods157 multi-region tumor samples and matched distant normal lung tissues from 29 treatment-naïve operable EGFR-mutant LUAD patients were collected to perform whole genome sequencing, panel sequencing and whole transcriptome sequencing. We aimed to comprehensively assess genomic and transcriptomic ITH between 19 Del and 21 L858R.

resultsThe 21 L858R LUAD exhibited significantly higher copy number variation (CNV) ITH index (ITHi) compared to the 19 Del LUAD, but there was no significant difference in somatic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) ITHi between them. Meanwhile, 19 Del LUAD owned more clonal genetic alterations, while 21 L858R LUAD had more subclonal events. Both linear and branch evolution models existed in 19 Del and 21 L858R LUAD. Besides, 19 Del seemed to be more dominant for driving tumor development, while other driver mutations participated jointly with 21 L858R in tumor evolution. Moreover, 19 Del LUAD exhibited significantly higher immune score and checkpoint inhibition signature than 21 L858R. Additionally, it indicated that high-level TMB might be a favorable prognostic factor for EGFR-mutant LUAD.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated diverse genomic heterogeneity and tumor immune microenvironment in EGFR-mutant LUAD, which might elaborate on potential explanations for different efficacy between 19 Del and 21 L858R and provide valuable hints to treatment strategy.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungErbB ReceptorsGene DeletionDrug Resistance, NeoplasmGenetic HeterogeneityHumansMutationPhylogenySignal TransductionTranscriptomeTumor MicroenvironmentEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors19 Del21 L858REGFREvolutionGenomicHeterogeneityImmune signatureITHLung adenocarcinomaTranscriptomic

Identifiers

PMID41826981
PMCPMC13101146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.