ArticleBMC oral health2026
Application of Coltosol F with a cotton-spacer technique for endodontic temporization: a clinical retrospective study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term radiographic changes of extruded NeoSealer Flo in a simulated enlarged-apex model: influence of moisture and periapical support.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Clinical and radiological outcomes of Thermafil Plus used with bioceramic versus epoxy-resin sealer: results from a 12-month randomized clinical trial.Odontology · 2026Article
- Single cone versus carrier-based obturation using a premixed bioceramic sealer in postgraduate master cohort: a 36 months retrospective evaluation.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTemporary restorative materials are important for maintaining coronal seal during multi-visit endodontic procedures. Coltosol F, a moisture-activated, self-setting material, is valued for its simplicity and sealing ability, though concerns exist regarding its potential to induce tooth fractures.
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical performance of Coltosol F as temporary restoration material, focusing on tooth fracture incidence, spontaneous dislodgement and the role of a cotton pellet as a spacer material. DuoTemp placed with a cotton pellet and Coltosol F placed without a cotton pellet were used as control groups. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective analysis of 153 consecutive patients requiring primary endodontic treatments (n = 185) performed in an endodontic clinical section from 2019 to 2024 was conducted. All treatments were performed by postgraduate master operators through a predefined rehabilitation protocol. A total of 111 patients, corresponding to 138 Coltosol F treated teeth, were analyzed: 107 teeth with a cotton pellet used as a spacer material (Group A) and 31 without (Group B). Additional groups included 15 patients with 18 teeth provisionally restored with Coltosol F and a cotton pellet under a provisional crown (Group C), and 27 patients with 29 teeth provisionally restored with DuoTEMP (Group D). Outcomes evaluated after 7-14 days included coronal fractures, root fractures and material dislodgment.
resultsAt 7-14 days, adverse events were rare. In the Group A with cotton pellet group, we observed 3 coronal fractures (2.8%), 1 root fracture (0.9%), and 5 spontaneous dislodgements (4.6%). In the Group B, there were 1 coronal fracture (3.2%), 1 root fracture (3.2%), and 1 dislodgement (3.2%). Group C had no adverse events. Group D showed 1 coronal fracture (3.4%) and no dislodgement. Between-group differences were not statistically significant.
conclusionColtosol F showed a low short-term incidence of fracture and dislodgement during 7-14-day inter-appointment temporization. No statistically significant differences were detected between groups. No adverse events were observed when the temporary restoration was shielded by a provisional crown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.