ArticleBMC medical education2026
Neurosurgery aspirants in UK medical schools: a national cross-sectional analysis of demographics, motivations, and confidence (FAST study).
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNeurosurgery is among the most competitive specialties in the UK, yet national data on who aspires to it and why are limited. Using the FAST study, we compared medical students who selected neurosurgery with peers choosing other specialties, examining demographics, extracurricular activity, certainty, confidence, and knowledge of the training pathway.
methodsSecondary analysis of the FAST cross-sectional survey of UK medical students conducted December 2023 to March 2024. Responses were collected via an online questionnaire covering demographics, education, extracurricular activity, certainty, confidence, knowledge of training pathways, and factors influencing specialty choice. We compared neurosurgery aspirants with the remaining cohort using descriptive statistics and logistic regression to estimate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Bonferroni corrections were applied where appropriate.
resultsOf 8,395 respondents, 212 students selected neurosurgery as their preferred specialty (2.53%). Interest declined sharply with seniority, from 4.5% of first-year students to 0.6% of final-year students. Compared with the national cohort, aspirants were more often male and from non-White ethnic groups. Private schooling was more frequent 29.7% vs 26.0% but not significant. Aspirants reported greater certainty about career choice (OR 2.43, p < 0.0001) and higher self-reported knowledge of the neurosurgery pathway. Confidence in securing a training post was low (20.8% confident) and the odds of low confidence were higher than the national cohort adjusted OR 1.37, p = 0.04. Males reported higher knowledge 67.3% vs 42.7% in females and greater confidence. Factors more strongly associated with choosing neurosurgery included intellectual challenge (OR 2.56, p < 0.0001), research opportunities (OR 4.07, p < 0.0001), and interest in specific conditions (OR 3.12, p < 0.0001). Lifestyle considerations were less influential than in peers: work-life balance (OR 0.33, p < 0.0001), compatibility with family life (OR 0.37, p < 0.0001), and job stress (OR 0.41, p < 0.0001).
conclusionDespite high levels of certainty and pathway knowledge, neurosurgery aspirants reported low confidence in securing a training post, with marked gender and socioeconomic disparities. Interest declines steeply with seniority, suggesting that early enthusiasm often fades due to limited exposure and perceived inaccessibility. Targeted early interventions, including early and sustained exposure, and visible mentorship, may help ensure informed, sustained interest among those best suited to the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.