SynthesisBMC public health2026
Video-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination among individuals aged 9 to 26: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most prevalent sexually transmitted infection in the U.S. and is associated with approximately 40,000 new cancer cases each year, affecting both males (e.g., oropharyngeal, anal cancers) and females (e.g., cervical, vaginal cancers). The CDC recommends HPV vaccination for individuals aged 9 to 26, and studies have shown that HPV vaccines are effective in reducing the rates of cancers. Video-based interventions may be an effective strategy to increase vaccination uptake. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on using video interventions to promote HPV vaccination outcomes (knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, self-efficacy, and uptake). A systematic review protocol was developed following PRISMA-P guidelines. Databases searched included CINAHL, PubMed, ERIC, and PsycINFO, using keywords from a comprehensive review of HPV vaccination interventions and videos, with no date restrictions. Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs and quasi-experimental studies using videos as interventions. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Pooled effect sizes (Hedge’s g) were calculated using random effects modeling via the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. Eighteen articles, including 5,873 participants (ranging from 35 to 739), were included in this review. The majority of these studies were conducted in the U.S. (k = 12, 66.6%), RCTs (k = 7, 38.8%), and included females (k = 16, n = 4,956, 84.4%). Most studies employed informational videos (n = 11, 61.2%), while five used narrative/storytelling videos. Four studies that combined videos with additional strategies. Of the studies reporting HPV vaccine outcomes (k = 8), initiation rates ranged from 2.4% to 51.9%. All eight studies (100%) reported significant improvements in HPV, vaccine, and/or cervical cancer knowledge. The five studies examining vaccine intention showed consistent increases in intent to vaccinate. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, yielding pooled effect sizes ranging from small to moderate (g = 0.16 to 0.62), indicating a modest but meaningful impact of video-based interventions on HPV-related outcomes. This review underscores the need to expand video-based interventions to promote HPV vaccination beyond traditional methods like education and flyers. More focus is needed on males aged 9 to 26, as most studies targeted females. Developing and evaluating strategies, including social media interventions, could enhance HPV vaccine uptake among adolescents and young adults. PROSPERO ID: CRD42025650071.Trial registrationPROSPERO ID: CRD42025650071.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.