ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Challenges and suffering of people with advanced illness in rural Nepal: a mixed method multiple case study in four municipalities.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNepal is experiencing increasing need for palliative care through the rising prevalence of non-communicable disease and an aging population. Most people live in rural areas where access to healthcare is limited. This study explores experiences of suffering and health seeking behaviour amongst people with palliative care needs (PWPCN) and their unpaid family caregivers in rural Nepal.
methodsA constructivist multiple case study design was employed across four rural municipalities (cases) in two districts. Cases included communities of varied ethnicity and human development indices served by a community hospital and village health posts. A house-to-house survey using the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for Low Income Settings (SPICT-LIS) identified PWPCN. Following completion of a structured questionnaire, a purposive sample of PWPCN was constructed (unit of analysis). They, their carers and key informants completed semi structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data were analysed thematically both within and across case.
resultsAmong 587 households surveyed, 58 PWPCN were identified. 20 units of analysis were formed with interviews from 17 PWPCN and 17 caregivers and 16 key informants. None of the PWPCN had access to palliative care services. Three themes emerged: (1) Everyone suffers: reflecting high levels of physical, emotional, spiritual and social pain. (2) Paying for healthcare: high out-of-pocket expenditure, debt, and financial vulnerability mitigated partially for some by health insurance. (3) Decision-making - no right answer: exposed difficulties choosing between limited local services and distant, costly tertiary care. Decisions were affected by distance to and location of health facility (particularly those offering health insurance), transportation, cost/family resources, and a strong belief that “better care is found in the city.” Bypassing nearby facilities for distant tertiary hospitals was common. High level of suffering and unmet need led to a feeling of lack of control. Older people particularly did not access health care because of cost and were resigned to their fate.
conclusionPWPCN in rural Nepal endure substantial suffering through unmet holistic needs and limited access to appropriate care. Financial hardship, geographical barriers, and perceived low-quality local services drive people toward distant facilities thus increasing costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.