ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Automatic identification of different stage of Alzheimer's disease using multimodal MRI and artificial intelligence.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Index Brain Function-Cognition Correlation in Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Resting-State fMRI Study.American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementiasArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to use multimodal MRI and artificial intelligence to automatically identify cognitive normal (CN), subjective cognitive decline (SCD), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and alzheimer’s disease (AD).
methods715 participants with different cognitive status (CN, SCD, MCI, AD) were enrolled from ADNI (for training/validation) and OASIS-3 (for external validation). All participants underwent structural MRI (sMRI) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). The sMRI of whole brain was segmented into 116 regions and the volumes of each region was obtained using 3D-VB-Net. 4528 radiomics features were extracted from hippocampus. Functional metrics (ALFF, fALFF, ReHo, FC) for each brain region were calculated using rs-fMRI data. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and K-best were used to reduce feature dimensionality. Machine learning was performed using bagging decision tree (BDT), logistic regression (LR), support-vector-machine (SVM) and random-forest (RF) classifiers. Evaluation metrics included the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, sensitivity and F1-score.
resultsA total of 4528 radiomic features, 116 volume features, and 464 functional features were extracted for each participant. After dimensionality reduction, the BDT model based on volume-function-radiomics features achieved the highest performance, with macro-average AUCs of 0.918 (95% CI: 0.890–0.944, specificity = 0.922, sensitivity = 0.769), 0.862 (95% CI: 0.784–0.935, specificity = 0.897, sensitivity = 0.692), and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.724–0.885, specificity = 0.877, sensitivity = 0.630) in the training, internal, and external validation sets, respectively.
conclusionsThis study was the first to develop a high-accuracy four-class classification model for CN, SCD, MCI, and AD identification by integrating multimodal MRI, deep learning and machine learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.