ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Metagenomic analysis of wolfberry branch substrates under tomato cultivation without additional nitrogen fertilization.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Goji Leaves and Buds as Food Resources: Composition, Processing, Safety, and Links to Side-Stream Valorization.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnder conditions without additional nitrogen fertilization, nitrogen availability in organic substrate–based horticultural systems depends largely on microbially mediated mineralization processes within the plant–substrate system. Woody agricultural wastes such as wolfberry (Lycium barbarum L.) branches contain substantial organic nitrogen pools and are increasingly used as cultivation substrates. However, how crop cultivation, particularly tomato as a representative horticultural crop, influences rhizosphere nitrogen cycling and microbial functional structure in such substrates remains poorly understood.
resultsA wolfberry branch-derived organic substrate was used without additional nitrogen fertilization; nitrogen supply relied entirely on mineralization of substrate-derived organic nitrogen. Two treatments were established: tomato cultivation (NZP) and no cultivation (NZNP). Tomato cultivation significantly increased ammonium nitrogen (NH₄⁺–N), organic nitrogen, and net nitrogen mineralization rates, while suppressing nitrate (NO₃⁻–N) accumulation. Urease activity was enhanced, whereas protease and sucrase activities declined, indicating a shift away from inorganic nitrogen dependence toward sustained organic nitrogen mineralization. Metagenomic analysis indicated shifts in community functional potential, with higher relative abundances of copiotrophic taxa (e.g., Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota) and increased relative abundance of nitrogen-transforming genera such as Thauera. The relative abundances of nirA and amoA showed statistically significant differences between treatments, whereas other nitrogen-cycling genes exhibited non-significant trends. Redundancy and correlation analyses identified pH, NH₄⁺–N, and microbial biomass nitrogen as key drivers shaping microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling functions.
conclusionsTomato cultivation significantly altered rhizosphere microbial community structure and nitrogen cycling functional profiles in wolfberry branch substrates under conditions without additional nitrogen fertilization. The observed increase in organic nitrogen mineralization and reduced nitrate accumulation suggest a potential shift in nitrogen transformation patterns; however, these findings reflect functional potential inferred from metagenomic analysis rather than directly measured nitrogen retention processes. These findings provide mechanistic insight into plant–microbe interactions that support efficient nitrogen use in organic substrate-based horticultural systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.