ArticleBMC medical imaging2026
Are 2D MRI slices equally important in microvascular invasion prediction: a study based on multiple instance learning with attention.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMicrovascular invasion (MVI) is a critical prognostic indicator of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although MRI-based prediction of MVI has drawn great attention, many previous studies focused on either 3D volumetric regions of tumors or the slices of the largest tumors size in the axial plane. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of 2D MRI slices on MVI, based on a multiple instance learning (MIL) method with an attention block to estimate the slice-wise importance.
methodsA total of 174 patients (training cohort: 121 patients; testing cohort: 53 patients) were evaluated in this retrospective study. MRI scans of arterial phase, venous phase and delayed phase, as well as sixteen clinical characteristics were collected. A transformer-based model was utilized to extract features from the original and dilated tumor regions (with 5 mm and 10 mm margins). A MIL based method was developed to predict MVI, with an attention block to estimate the slice-wise weights. Eighteen phase-specific and six combined-phase models were trained and tested. Three hybrid models were constructed from the best-performed models. Area under the curve (AUC), precision, accuracy, F1 were utilized to evaluate model performance. Centered kernel alignment (CKA) analysis was employed to assess the value of the learned weights of MRI slices by estimating their correlation with histopathological image.
resultsArterial phase outperformed other phase-specific and combined-phase models on test AUC (two best models: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.63, 0.91; 0.78, 95%CI: 0.64, 0.90). The hybrid model using soft voting strategy achieved the highest test AUC (0.80, 95%CI: 0.69, 0.92) in this study. CKA analysis of one patient’s data showed that the top 5 MRI slices of the highest weights have stronger correlation with MVI than others (0.87 versus 0.75).
conclusionThe group of 2D MRI slices demonstrated predictive value for MVI prediction using a MIL method. The learned weights of MRI slices from the attention block indicate their potential relevance with MVI. These findings may help to identify the most relevant MRI slices for MVI prediction, which may be utilized in MVI diagnosis in future applications. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.