ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Projecting future distribution of Glycyrrhiza uralensis under climate change: implications for conservation and sustainable management.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Projected shifts in the potential distribution ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClimate change poses a significant threat to global ecosystems by altering the geographical distribution of plant species. Glycyrrhiza uralensis, a plant of considerable economic importance, is distributed widely across arid and semi-arid regions. Understanding how its habitat suitability and distribution may shift in response to climate change is crucial for its sustainable management and conservation. This study used species distribution modeling to project current and future distribution patterns of G. uralensis in China and Mongolia, providing a scientific basis for its resource assessment and conservation. The present study used species occurrence data for G. uralensis from field surveys conducted in Mongolia and the Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Using the biomod2 package in R, species distribution models were developed to project current and future habitat suitability for G. uralensis under various climate change scenarios. The models were used to assess potential shifts in suitable range and to identify key environmental factors influencing the distribution.
resultsThe models indicated that under current climatic conditions, areas suitable for G. uralensis shifted from highly suitable to moderately and lowly suitable regions. The highly suitable areas were fragmented, covering approximately 250,028 km2. Altitude, mean annual precipitation, and mean temperature of the driest quarter had a significant impact on the distribution of habitats suitable for G. uralensis, whereas soil-related variables had a relatively minor impact. Under the different future scenarios, the distribution of G. uralensis showed a consistent significantly decreasing trend. The most pronounced trend of continuous habitat reduction was observed under the SSP585 scenario. Even under the more optimistic SSP126 scenario, habitats are projected to decrease substantially, highlighting the sustained negative impact of climate change on the area of distribution of G. uralensis regardless of the emission scenario.
conclusionThe findings suggest that both China and Mongolia possess stable and extensive habitats suitable for G. uralensis. Particularly, Mongolia potentially provides a critical geographical resource for sustainable management and conservation of the species under a changing climate. The present study highlights the imperative for transboundary cooperation between China and Mongolia in the development of appropriate strategies for G. uralensis resource utilization, conservation, and sustainable management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.