Observational studyEpilepsia2026
Long-term safety of early discontinuation of antiseizure medication after resolution of acute provoked neonatal seizures.
Observational study in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess long-term safety of antiseizure medication (ASM) discontinuation after resolution of acute provoked neonatal seizures and prior to hospital discharge.
methodsProspective, observational, comparative effectiveness cohort study of neonates with acute provoked seizures born from July 2015 to March 2018, and followed until September 2024, at nine U.S. Neonatal Seizure Registry centers with Level IV neonatal intensive care units and Level IV pediatric epilepsy programs. Duration of ASM treatment was quantified as (1) discontinuation before discharge from the neonatal seizure admission or (2) maintenance at the time of hospital discharge. Outcomes were adjusted for propensity to receive ASM at discharge. Propensity for ASM maintenance was defined among enrolled participants by a logistic regression model including seizure etiology, gestational age, therapeutic hypothermia, worst electroencephalography (EEG) background, days of EEG seizures, and discharge neurological exam (all p ≤ .1 in a joint model, except etiology, which was included for face validity). The primary outcome was non-inferiority of cognition (Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence assessed at age 5-6 years). Secondary outcomes were non-inferiority of functional development (Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale, 3rd Edition, assessed at 3-8 years) and post-neonatal epilepsy (assessed at 1-8 years).
resultsAmong 284 children with at least one follow-up, outcomes were similar in the discontinued vs maintained ASM groups for full-scale IQ at age 5 years (adjusted difference +10 points), functional development at ages 3-8 years (adjusted difference 0 points), and post-neonatal epilepsy at ages 1-8 years (adjusted hazard ratio .93, 95% confidence interval [CI] .48-1.80). SIGNIFICANCE: Prolonged administration of ASM for several months after resolution of acute provoked neonatal seizures may expose infants to unnecessary medications. These results provide additional evidence for safety of discontinuing ASM for most neonates soon after the resolution of acute provoked seizures-a practice that is recommended in the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guideline for neonatal seizure management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.