ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Simultaneous manipulation of emotion and working memory load distorts temporal distance memory.
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although emotion and working memory load have been demonstrated to distort the perception of individual temporal durations, the impact of these factors on memories for elapsed time, in particular within the context of event sequences, remains underexplored. Much existing work on the effects of emotion and working memory load on duration processing has, moreover, examined the impact of these factors individually. Relatively limited work has explored the influence of multiple factors in combination, an important consideration given that our everyday memories are likely to be impacted by multiple factors experienced at the same time. To address these issues, the present study explored the simultaneous impact of emotion and working memory load on memory for temporal distance associated with event sequences. Participants first completed an N-back task (either 1-back or 2-back) involving the presentation of emotional images (either negative-high arousal or positive-low arousal), followed by a temporal distance rating task in which they reported how far apart different pairs of images were presented during the N-back task. Results showed that negative-high arousal images as well as low working memory load led to overestimated temporal distances compared to positive-low arousal images and high working memory load, respectively. There was relatively little evidence that these factors interact consistently, perhaps pointing towards the involvement of distinct underlying mechanisms. These findings provide novel insight into how our temporal sequence memories can be influenced and distorted by the varying levels of emotion and working memory load that we experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41826788What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.