Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826788›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Simultaneous manipulation of emotion and working memory load distorts temporal distance memory.

Gahyun Kim, Qun Ye, Andy C H Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gahyun KimDepartment of Psychology (Scarborough), University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada. gh.kim@mail.utoronto.ca.
Qun YeZhejiang Key Laboratory of Intelligent Education Technology and Application, Zhejiang Normal University, Zhejiang, China.
Andy C H LeeDepartment of Psychology (Scarborough), University of Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, ON, M1C 1A4, Canada. andych.lee@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although emotion and working memory load have been demonstrated to distort the perception of individual temporal durations, the impact of these factors on memories for elapsed time, in particular within the context of event sequences, remains underexplored. Much existing work on the effects of emotion and working memory load on duration processing has, moreover, examined the impact of these factors individually. Relatively limited work has explored the influence of multiple factors in combination, an important consideration given that our everyday memories are likely to be impacted by multiple factors experienced at the same time. To address these issues, the present study explored the simultaneous impact of emotion and working memory load on memory for temporal distance associated with event sequences. Participants first completed an N-back task (either 1-back or 2-back) involving the presentation of emotional images (either negative-high arousal or positive-low arousal), followed by a temporal distance rating task in which they reported how far apart different pairs of images were presented during the N-back task. Results showed that negative-high arousal images as well as low working memory load led to overestimated temporal distances compared to positive-low arousal images and high working memory load, respectively. There was relatively little evidence that these factors interact consistently, perhaps pointing towards the involvement of distinct underlying mechanisms. These findings provide novel insight into how our temporal sequence memories can be influenced and distorted by the varying levels of emotion and working memory load that we experience.

Indexed as

EmotionsMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualTime PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEmotionEpisodic memoryTemporal memoryTemporal memory distortionWorking memory load

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.