Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826782›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Perceptions and Understanding of Fertility Preservation among Jordanian Muslim Cancer Patients: Sociocultural and Islamic Perspectives.

Muntaha K Gharaibeh, Sawsan Abuhammad, Arwa Oweis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muntaha K GharaibehDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. muntaha@just.edu.jo.
Sawsan AbuhammadDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Arwa OweisDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, 22110, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fertility preservation is a vital issue in cancer care because cancer interventions can lead to temporary or permanent infertility. Previous studies have identified a gap in Muslim patients' perspectives on fertility preservation. This qualitative study explored Jordanian Muslim cancer patients' understanding of treatment-related fertility risks and their perceptions of fertility preservation and available options. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 patients from cancer clinics in a referral hospital in Jordan using a validated interview guide. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. Two major themes with four interconnected subthemes were identified: (1) Denied Fertility Rights (gaps in information and counseling; too late to decide) and (2) Sociocultural and Religious Influences (balancing cancer with fertility; fertility preservation is for men only). Participants described limited counseling on fertility risks and preservation options, often learning about fertility preservation only after treatment had begun. Women reported sociocultural barriers and a "culture of silence," despite Islamic teachings that encourage seeking infertility treatment. Findings highlight the need for culturally responsive, gender-equitable integration of oncofertility counseling and services within cancer care pathways in Jordan.

Indexed as

Cancer patientsFertility preservationGender inequityIslamic perspectivesJordanOncofertilitySociocultural factors

Identifiers

PMID41826782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.