ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Are amblyopia therapy outcomes related to socioeconomic situation for children in Greater Manchester?
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited evidence exists around health inequalities in amblyopia therapy. This cohort study explores amblyopia therapy outcomes and socioeconomic scores by postcode, across two boroughs within Greater Manchester.
methodsAll available orthoptic records for school vision screening referrals from the academic year 2017-2018 were reviewed by one Research Orthoptist, to identify children diagnosed with unilateral amblyopia. Clinical data were extracted and the proportion amblyopia deficit corrected and appointment attendance rates over 1 year of therapy were calculated. Home postcodes were used to identify socioeconomic situation for each patient, by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2019 and Townsend Deprivation Index 2011.
resultsFrom 730 school screening referrals, 512 orthoptic records were accessible and 42 cases of unilateral amblyopia were identified. The median proportion amblyopia deficit corrected in 1 year was 51.0% (IQR 22.6-72.9). The median attendance rate was 87.5% (IQR 67.9-100.0); 47.6% of patients attended every appointment. No statistically significant relationships were found between socioeconomic score and the proportion amblyopia deficit corrected in a year (IMD: unstandardised beta coefficient 1.782, 95% CI -1.877 to 5.441, p = 0.331) or orthoptic clinic attendance rates (IMD: unstandardised beta coefficient -0.479, 95% CI -2.492 to 1.534, p = 0.633). A positive relationship was found between attendance rate and proportion amblyopia deficit corrected (unstandardised beta coefficient 0.743, 95% CI 0.213 to 1.274, p = 0.007).
conclusionIn two Greater Manchester community orthoptic services, amblyopia therapy outcome and clinic attendance rate were not related to individual socioeconomic scores by postcode. A positive relationship between orthoptic clinic attendance rate and amblyopia therapy outcome was found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.