Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41826693›Full record

ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2026

CO and N

Charlotte Calvet, Philipp Villiger, Francesco Prisco, Tim Buchholz, Felix Gantenbein, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Boris Gourévitch, Carsten A Wagner, Petra Seebeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Charlotte CalvetInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Philipp VilligerInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Francesco PriscoLaboratory for Animal Model Pathology, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tim BuchholzInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Felix GantenbeinInstitute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christa Thöne-ReinekeAnimal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute for Animal Welfare, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Boris GourévitchInstitut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, F-75012, France.
Carsten A Wagner *Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Petra Seebeck *Zurich Integrative Rodent Physiology (ZIRP), Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. petra.seebeck@uzh.ch.

Funding

Bundesamt für Lebensmittelsicherheit und Veterinärwesen 2.21.03TSCH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is commonly used for rat euthanasia, but its potential negative side effects call for alternatives causing less distress while providing a fast and reliable loss of consciousness (LOC). Euthanasia with CO2 is currently performed in a highly non-standardized manner with different CO2 volume displacement rates/minute (VDRM) ranging from replacing 30 to 70% of the chamber volume with 100% CO2 per minute. Therefore, we evaluated euthanasia with 100% CO2 at 30% and 70% VDRM as well as carbon monoxide (8.6% CO at 70% VDRM), nitrogen (100% N2 at 70% VDRM) and isoflurane anesthesia (6% and 2.1% at 70% VDRM) in female and male rats. We used a multi-modal approach including telemetry for ECG, blood pressure (BP), heart rate measurements, EEG, and plethysmography. Video-recordings were used to track behavior during euthanasia. Stress hormones and lung pathology were assessed post-mortem. A VDRM of 70% CO2 resulted in a rapid LOC compared to 30%, thus, minimizing the time in which distress and eventually pain can be experienced. Nevertheless, the higher amount of distress experienced until LOC potentially outweighs the benefits of a faster LOC. CO and N2 resulted in longer times to LOC, seizures before LOC, increased stress hormone levels, and caused more lung damage. Therefore, CO and N2 are not humane alternatives to CO2 and should not be recommended for euthanasia in rats.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideEuthanasia, AnimalNitrogenAnimalsBlood PressureFemaleHeart RateMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideNitrogenAnimal welfareDistressEuthanasiaPlethysmographyRatsSeizuresTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID41826693
PMCPMC12987893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.